Believing the Hype
By Marty Shindler
It’s a trap, so be careful not to fall into it!
You can be lured in by people you trust, and you can fall victim to it
without even knowing it. This trap sometimes even snares the ones who
set it.
The trap is hype. The dictionary defines hype as "exaggerated
or false publicity." These days, almost everyone is guilty of hype,
individuals and companies of all kinds and sizes. And people who believe
the hype have been around since the earliest days. It seems to me that
the first great modern hypester, P.T. Barnum, had some thoughts on the
matter.
There’s a fine line between positive spin, or "presenting
things in their best light," and hype. Within organizations, the
former can be important in building support for programs, missions, and
philosophies. A positive image is a way to rally the troops, build camaraderie,
and create corporate culture. As long as it is not taken to an extreme,
it can have a positive effect.
But when it crosses the line into hype, employees can
begin to believe it to the exclusion of important facts to the contrary.
Then it may be too late, especially if hype forms the basis for communication
with clients or the public. Fact must always prevail over fiction, but
that is easier said than done.
Advertising has been a part of our lives for years. Now
it is there all day, every day. As we grow older we can develop internal
BS detectors and become more immune to the extremes to which ads go. We
learn to separate out the hype from the rest of the message.
Unfortunately, hype and advertising is spreading into
other areas, and now occasionally gets mixed into news and other supposedly
"factual" media. While our BS detectors may have become well
attuned to the excesses of advertising, they are not always as good at
discovering the hype in news items and press releases, which often gain
credibility from their serious contexts.
Public relations firms have become very successful at
placing company hype in the guise of news, and editors at newspapers and
media outlets have often used this false news without questioning its
source or objectivity.
A number of companies have recently been caught mismanaging
their hype machines. Not too long ago Merrill Lynch announced a settlement
with the State of New York related to public announcements that hyped
certain stocks, while internal communications indicated that the firm’s
analysts thought otherwise.
This is a perfect example of saying one thing publicly,
but having an entirely different message behind closed doors. This practice
helped line the pockets of those analysts, while members of the public
took the losses. Unfortunately, the $100 million settlement is small change
to an organization the size of Merrill Lynch, so we can’t expect it to
have a serious deterrent effect.
Another example is the Rigas family, which controlled
Adelphia, another organization that has been in the news recently. The
company gained respect when it bought up cable systems several years ago
and took on the role of gatekeeper by not allowing certain types of programming
to be transmitted. This infuriated some customers who resented management’s
imposing its moral standards on them. Others applauded the practice.
Now that we have learned that some of these gatekeeper
deals were primarily for benefit of the Rigases, they appear totally hypocritical.
But which is worse? In our free society, neither gatekeeping nor crooked
deals should be tolerated. The family’s resignation from the company is
probably the beginning of the demise of the company.
There are antidotes to the hype trap, but they are not
easy. Let’s look at what companies can do:
- Every organization needs someone who is not afraid to stand up and
say that the messages being delivered or considered are false, misleading,
or out of context. Gadflies are often a fundamental part of an effective
organization.
- Boards of directors should be consulted on the messages that are relayed
to shareholders and the public. Independent board members may be able
to stand up and shout "No!" Boards are becoming increasingly
important in this regard, but probably not nearly enough.
Some protective measures for individuals:
- Careful reading of statistics, and an understanding of how they can
be used to mislead, is essential. A great basic text on this is How
to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff. Written in 1954, it is still
in print and as useful today as it ever was.
- Press announcements that restate earnings or disclose changes in accounting
practices (for example revenue recognition policies) may signal that
the company has overhyped itself. They may also be an indication of
poor general or financial management.
- A review of press releases over an extended period of time can yield
clues to an organization’s true hype quotient. Extraordinary sales reports
should be looked at carefully, especially in light of the aforementioned
revenue recognition policies. Sales can be manufactured to fuel hype,
but at some point reality must set in.
- Significant management turnover is frequently a strong indicator that
something is amiss at a company.
Believing other people’s hype is a trap that is sometimes
difficult to avoid. Most of all, we must avoid believing our own hype.
|